Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Warrior

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1969No. Nos. 179-68, 180-68PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

Warrior and his co-defendants, as members of an Oklahoma Board of Education, contracted to buy a tract of land from Freeman and his co-plaintiffs. The buyers breached the contract and the sellers sued for specific performance or, in the alternative, for damages. Jurisdiction is based on diversity. The district court denied specific performance. This aspect of the judgment is not attacked. Damages were awarded the sellers in the amount of $6,000. All parties attack this award. The buyers also claim that the court erred in finding that the purchase contract was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buena Vista Homes, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Clay King and Dorothy Lee King v. Grand River Dam Authority, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Corvino v. 910 South Boston Realty CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heydt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. MacOn-bibb County Water & Sewerage Authority v. Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1981
  3. Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. United States ex rel. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. Dallas Ceramic Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Hensel Phelps Construction Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API