Legal Opinion

Clay King and Dorothy Lee King v. Grand River Dam Authority, a Public Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 29, 1964No. 7539_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to condemn land for the Markham Ferry Dam and Reservoir Project in Oklahoma. Trial was to a jury and reversal is sought because of the alleged erroneous admission of evidence.

Appellee Grand River Dam Authority is a state instrumentality licensed by the Federal Power Commission. As such licensee it has the right to sue in the federal courts for the condemnation of project lands. 1 The jury fixed the damages sustained by the appellant landowners at $20,500.

Part of the property of the landowners, was not taken. The parties agree that in détermining…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buena Vista Homes, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Rapid Transit Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  4. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Freeman v. WarriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  3. Harry C. Freeman, Virginia Freeman Johnson, and Frances D. Reynolds v. E. W. Warrior, W. G. Moffitt, L. A. Rounds, George Easley and B. J. Traw, as the Board of Education of Indian Capitol Area Vocational-Technical School, District No. 4, and Indian Capitol Area Vocational-Technical School, District No. 4, Harry C. Freeman v. E. W. WarriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API