Legal Opinion
Heydt v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 8, 1997No. 92-307CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This is an action for the recovery of the reasonable rental value of two facilities located in Idabel and Commerce, Oklahoma, and *292used by the Federal Government to store military clothing and clothing parts for approximately twenty months. The plaintiffs in this action contend that they had an implied-in-faet contract with the Government for the storage costs of the Government's property, or in the alternative, that the Government took their property without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Trial was held in this…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gargoyles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Allenfield Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Central Pines Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Alameda Gateway, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.