Legal Opinion
Corvino v. 910 South Boston Realty Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 23, 1958No. 37426PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Chief Justice.
Alexander Bisno filed this action in district court against the defendant, 910 South Boston Realty Company, a corporation, for breach of contract and damages arising therefrom. A jury was waived and the case was tried to the court, and judgment was rendered for defendant.
Subsequent to the judgment, the plaintiff in the trial court Alexander Bisno assigned all of his interest in the case to Mildred Corvino, who was substituted for Alexander Bisno by order of the trial court, and she has filed her appeal in this court upon the original record.
The record reveals that a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. GoforthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Bentley v. Zelma Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Farmers' State Bank of Belpre v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Randall Co. v. GlendenningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- O'NEAL v. UptonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heydt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Davidson Oil Country Supply Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Eqpt. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Freeman v. WarriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Harry C. Freeman, Virginia Freeman Johnson, and Frances D. Reynolds v. E. W. Warrior, W. G. Moffitt, L. A. Rounds, George Easley and B. J. Traw, as the Board of Education of Indian Capitol Area Vocational-Technical School, District No. 4, and Indian Capitol Area Vocational-Technical School, District No. 4, Harry C. Freeman v. E. W. WarriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969