Caspar Lumber Co. v. Stowell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued to recover the balance due upon a written contract for the sale of real property. The defendant interposed a general and special demurrer, which was sustained without leave to amend. Since the plaintiff did not request leave to amend, the question before us is whether the demurrer to the complaint is good upon any7 ground. This limitation is stated clearly in Stillwell Hotel Co. v. Anderson, 4 Cal. (2d) 463, 464 [50 Pac. (2d) 441], as follows: “The record fails to show that leave to amend was asked and refused between the dates of order and judgment, hence, no error may7 be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Fitzpatrick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Haddad v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Employees' Participating Assn. v. PineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Grimes v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.