Grimes v. Steele
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J. pro tem.
On June 21, 1933, appellants, as vendees, and respondents, as vendors, entered into an agreement for the purchase and sale of certain real estate. Appellants brought this action for specific performance of the agreement, and respondents filed a cross-complaint praying that their title be quieted. The court found that appellants were in default and had forfeited all rights under the contract before the bringing of this action. The judgment deified specific performance and quieted respondents’ title to the property.
The agreement provided for a total purchase price of $643…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Stockmen's Supply Co. v. JenneIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Plante v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.