Legal Opinion
Van Gesner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1907No. Nos. 1,369, 1,370, 1,368PublishedCited by 14 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
These cases were tried and submitted together; the plaintiffs in error being jointly charged by indictment with the crime of conspiracy to suborn perjury, in violation of the provisions of section 5440 of the Revised Statutes of the United States [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3676J. In respect to the plaintiff in error Williamson, this statement is made in the brief of coixnsel for the plaintiffs in error, to wit:
“Prior to the writ of error in this case, the defendant Williamson, who was a representative in Congress, had sued out a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McLish v. RoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jelke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- United States v. AlghazouliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.