Legal Opinion
Rumely v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 27, 1923No. 135PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error have been convicted under an indictment which charged them with having conspired to defraud the United States by obstructing and preventing the United States from seizing and administering a certain indebtedness of the* defendant Rumely to the Imperial German government. It was alleged as part of the conspiracy that the defendants should conceal the fact of such indebtedness to the German government, and should make false and misleading reports to the Alien Property Custodian of the United States, and so obstruct and prevent the transfer and…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. ShuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Hyman Harvey Klein, Maurice Haas, and Morris O. AlprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Little v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- In Re Joseph A. Vause and Virgie L. Vause, Debtors. Joseph A. Vause and Virgie L. Vause v. Capital Poly Bag, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- George C. Finn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.