Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1908No. 1,497PublishedCited by 44 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were defendants in the court below to an indictment based upon the provisions of section 5440 of the Revised Statutes (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3076), which reads as follows:

“If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States in any manner or for any X>urpose, and one or more of such parties do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, all the parties to such conspiracy shall be liable to a penalty of not less than one thousand dollars and not more than ten thousand dollars,…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  3. People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Marino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API