Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1910No. 1,731PublishedCited by 30 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. Willard N. Jones was convicted of a criminal offense, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was charged by indictment in the Circuit Court for the District of Oregon with John H. Mitchell, Binger Hermann, John N. Williamson, Franklin P. Mays, and George Sorenson with the crime of conspiracy, alleged to have been- entered into on the 15th day of February, 1902, between the parties named, “and with divers other persons to the said grand jurors unknown,” to defraud the United States out of the possession and use of and title to divers large tracts of the public lands of the United States of great value, to wit, 200,000 acres of the public…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Marino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Coulston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Tincher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  4. Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  5. Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API