Legal Opinion

McLish v. Roff

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 7, 1891No. 1158PublishedCited by 193 opinions

ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE INDIAN TERRITORY. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamar

This was a suit brought in the United States Court for the Indian Territory, Third Judicial Division, by A. B. Boff and W. B. "Watkins against Bichard McLish, for the recovery of about 640 acres of land situated in the Chickasaw Nation, and belonging to said tribe. In their amended complaint, they alleged that the defendant, Biehard McLish, is a member of the tribe of Chickasaw Indians by blood ; that both plaintiffs, Boff and Watkins, were born in the United States, and are now, and always have been, citizens of the United States, neither of them ever having renounced their allegiance to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. In Re ClaasenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by193 opinions

  1. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Alioto v. Town of LisbonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API