Legal Opinion
['Innovator Enterprises, Inc. v. Jones']
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 19, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0581PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Innovator Enterprises, Inc. (“Innovator”) brings this action against B. Todd Jones, in his official capacity as the director of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF” or “the agency”). Innovator brings two claims, seeking (1) to set aside agency action as “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law” under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) (“APA”), and (2) a declaratory judgment that Innovator’s product, the “Stabibzer…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sig Sauer, Inc. v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Huff v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Steele v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Sig Sauer, Inc. v. JonesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- National Federation of Federal Employees, Fd1, Iamaw, Afl-Cio v. GibsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.