Legal Opinion

Steele v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 1, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-1523PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs bring this class action against the United States to challenge regulations promulgated by the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service requiring tax return preparers to obtain and pay fees for preparer tax identification numbers (PTINs). Both parties have moved for partial summary judgment on the first issue raised in plaintiffs’ lawsuit: whether Treasury and the IRS have the authority to require that all tax return preparers obtain and pay for a PTIN. 1 For the reasons stated below, the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brittany Montrois v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Adam Steele v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  3. Steele v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  4. Steele v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. Steele v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API