Legal Opinion

Mason v. Mason

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1979No. 16010PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Sheila Mason instituted this separate action to renew a judgment previously entered in supplemental proceedings in the divorce action between these parties. The main issue raised by the defendant is that such an action is not maintainable, but that the judgment becomes barred after eight years, as provided in Section 78-12-22, U.C.A. (1953). 1 From a ruling adverse to his contention defendant appeals.

The parties were married in 1957 and two children were born to them. Plaintiff was granted a decree of divorce in 1959 which awarded her the custody of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yergensen v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Harrison v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Harmon v. HarmonUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Wilder v. ColburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State ex rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. MusselmanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wood v. WeenigCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. In Re Child Support of MasonMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. McCarthy v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API