Wood v. Weenig
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIDSON, Judge:
Defendants appeal from the District Court’s denial of their motion to set aside default judgment. They assert that defendant Erma P. Weenig (Erma) was not properly served in the underlying action and that she has a good defense which she should have been permitted to raise and litigate before the trial court. We affirm.
Plaintiff obtained a judgment against defendant Harry M. Weenig (Harry) in the Marion Circuit Court, State of Indiana, on February 1, 1974. The judgment was for the sum of $200,000.00 with interest thereon at eight percent per annum plus costs incurred in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Katz v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Garcia v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Mason v. MasonUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. MusselmanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Dang v. Cox Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reliance Insurance v. Mast Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Banco Latino, S.A.C.A. v. Gomez LopezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
- BB & T v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Barclay v. Crown Building & Development, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- CRB v. State, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.