Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Johnson
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 24, 1997No. 2:87-CV-0944-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
SAM, Chief Judge.
The court has before it plaintiffs motion to renew judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a) and Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-22. By her motion, plaintiff seeks to renew the judgment she obtained against defendant Michael Heath Johnson on August 6, 1990 in the principal amount of $6,243,738.00 plus applicable interest. Mr. Johnson opposes the motion asserting that “since a request to renew a judgment is not a motion ‘in aid of execution’ of a judgment, Rule 69 does not authorize the relief sought”. Defendant’s Memorandum in Opposition, p. 2. Mr. Johnson further…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Duffy v. HartsockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Bank of Edwardsville v. RaffaelleIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
- Berly v. SiasTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Silverman v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Yergensen v. FordUtah Supreme Court · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cadle Co. II, Inc. v. FiscusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Institutional Securities of Colorado, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- O'CONNOR v. Midwest Pipe Fabricators, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002