Town of Hooker v. Morris
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court, Texas County; Arthur Gr. Sutton, Judge. Action by the Town of Hooker against Joe S. Miorris. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JONES, C.
This cause was instituted in the district court of Texas county, Okla., by the town of Hooker, Okla., a municipal corporation, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against J. S. Morris, defendant in error, defendant below, and is a suit to quiet title in plaintiff in and to blocks one and fourteen in the Murphy-Morris addition to the town of Hooker, Okla. Plainr tiff alleges that in December, 1906, the defendant, J. S. Morris, was the owner in fee ¡simple oí a tiact of laud containing 80.10 acres in tlie northeast quarter of section 83, township 5 north of range IT B. 0.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Adoue Lobit v. Town of LaporteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Brownsville v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Keyokla Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hampton v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932