Legal Opinion

People v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1888No. 11,769PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Santa Clara County,- D. Belden, Judge. Action by the people against Reed to compel the defendant to remove obstructions from an alleged public street in the city of San Jose. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

This action is brought to compel the defendants to remove obstructions from an alleged public street in the city of San Jose. The plaintiff alleges and the defendant denies that the land upon which the obstructions are maintained is a part of a public street. Upon that issue the court below found in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, and rendered judgment accordingly. From the judgment this appeal is taken. The contention of appellant is that the findings do not justify the judgment. Whether the facts found justify the conclusion that the" land in controversy was dedicated and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Holdane v. . Trustees of the Village of Cold SpringNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Pierpoint v. Town of HarrisvilleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Hayward v. ManzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Tate v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Town of Hooker v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API