Legal Opinion

Siegenthaler v. Newton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1935No. 22887PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiffs, recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as defendant, adjudging and decreeing a 25-foot strip of ground along the east line of the north half of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 34, township 12 north, range 4 west, in Oklahoma county, Okla., to be a public street or highway, and enjoining the plaintiff in error from obstructing the use thereof as such, from which the latter appeals. The following questions are involved in the appeal: (1) Was there a sufficient statutory…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Foot v. Town of WatongaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Marland v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. East Birmingham Realty Co. v. Birmingham Machine & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Cemetery Ass'n v. MeningerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. City of Los Angeles v. McCollumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Drane v. AveryArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lindauer v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Terminal Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. PrigmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Langston City v. GustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API