Legal Opinion

Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Keyokla Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1931No. 21503PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff below, commenced this action against defendants in error for injunctive relief, to restrain defendants from drilling an oil and .gas well on certain property which was formerly a part of what was known as Govern, lot 7, and a part of the N. W. % of the N. E. % of section 2, township 11 N., range 3 W., Oklahoma county, Okla. The east boundary line of said lot 7 was the center line of the North Canadian river. A patent covering lot 7 was issued by the United States government to William H. Holley on June 23, 1900; through mesne conveyances Mrs. D. E. Moreland…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Banks v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Downey v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. In re RobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Haines v. McLeanTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Askins v. British-American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. State v. ArnimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Interest of B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hunzicker v. KleedenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API