Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1932No. 20286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKornegay, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff in error on September 27, 1923, under a tax title against a great number of defendants in the city of Oklahoma City, the defendants being either the owners of lots, or heirs of owners, or trustees of owners of property in Shaw’s Heights addition to Oklahoma City, the property in controversy being lot No. 20, the term lot and block being used interchangeably in the proceeding. It is averred in the petition that the plaintiff, since July 31, 1919, had been the owner and in possession of the property, and the defendants named constitute “all of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. McKinley v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. City of Jacksonville v. Jacksonville Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Village of Princeville v. AutenIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fortson Investment Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Mobbs v. City of LehighCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API