Arnold v. San Ramon Valley Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Defendant appeals from the judgment. The record on appeal consists of the judgment-roll alone.
The judgment was for five hundred dollars and was based on the following facts set forth in the findings:
Several years prior to 1916 one. Wallace Taylor became indebted to the defendant upon a promissory note to the amount of seven hundred dollars. In February, 1916, he gave a new note in renewal thereof and it became due June 30, 1916. From December, 1915, to August 7, 1916, Taylor had a regular ordinary deposit account with the defendant. Prior to May 8, 1916, the account of said Taylor was kept in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cady v. South Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Florence Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Pullen v. Placer Country BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Downey v. HumphreysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Bromberg v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.