Legal Opinion
Food & Grocery Bureau v. Garfield
California Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1942No. L. A. 17877PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The Food and Grocery Bureau of Southern California, a trade association, brought an action against the appellant, who is the proprietor of nine retail drug stores, to enjoin him from issuing trading stamps to his customers. The appeal is from an order granting a preliminary injunction. Pending a determination of the respective rights of the parties, this court issued a writ of supersedeas. (Food and Grocery Bureau v. Garfield, 18 Cal. (2d) 174 [114 P. (2d) 579].)
The complaint includes three causes of action. By the first, it is alleged that the appellant, in addition to handling the usual…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Tanner v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Ex Parte DrexelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hewin v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Co. v. PickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. HoeghSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Oklahoma Retail Grocers Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Weco Products Co. v. Mid-City Cut Rate Drug StoresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Eisenberg's White House, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.