Legal Opinion
Weco Products Co. v. Mid-City Cut Rate Drug Stores
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 1942No. Civ. 13779PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J. pro tem.
In this action plaintiff, manufacturer of toothbrushes and other toilet articles, sought to enjoin defendant, retail druggist, from giving “trading stamps” with plaintiff’s trade-marked commodities when such articles were sold at the minimum prices stipulated by plaintiff under the California Fair Trade Act. It was claimed that by so giving trading stamps the retailer in effect sold the commodities at less than the minimum stipulated prices. Plaintiff prevailed and defendant appeals.
Enacted in 1931 and subsequently amended in 1933 and 1937, the Fair Trade Act is now codified…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Bristol-Myers Co. v. Lit Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Winston v. Beeson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- State v. HoltgreveUtah Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bristol-Myers Co. v. PickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Oklahoma Retail Grocers Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Cooley v. White Cross Health & Beauty Aid Discount Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Dept. of Agriculture v. Tide Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Eisenberg's White House, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.