Ex Parte Drexel
California Supreme Court
APPLICATIONS for Writs of Habeas Corpus to the Chief -of Police of the City and County of San Francisco. >
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
These two causes are submitted together and involve the same questions. Each is a petitioner upon habeas corpus to be discharged from what is alleged to be an illegal imprisonment. Each petitioner is imprisoned upon a charge of misdemeanor for violating ascertain act of the legislature of this state, approved March 7, 1905, which may be generally designated as the “Anti Trade Stamp or Coupon Act” (Stats. 1905, p. 67); and each contends that ■said act is invalid and is violative of section 1 of article I ■of the constitution of California, which declares that all men have the inalienable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ex parte WhitwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ruhstrat v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- City of Santa Barbara v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- People v. VictorMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.