Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Hoegh
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMulroney, J.
The central question presented by this appeal is the constitutionality of the gift enterprise statutes (sections 553.15 to 553.18, Code, 19'50) as applied to plaintiff’s trading stamp business. Section 553.15, Code, 1950, prohibits all “gift enterprises, as hereinafter defined” and section 553.16, Code, 1950, defines the term “gift enterprise” in one of the longest sentences in the Code, filled with abundant legal phraseology, to mean a scheme whereby a seller of merchandise would issue trading stamps to purchasers redeemable by someone other than the seller.* Section 553.17 provides for…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Tanner v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- People v. VictorMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Ex Parte DrexelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Racing Ass'n of Central Iowa v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Chicago Title Insurance Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Collins v. State Board of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v. FachmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.