Tanner v. Little
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE. EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. This case was submitted with Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, ante, p. 342, and attacks the validity of a statute of the State of Washington of the same genéral import and purpose as the Florida, statute passed, on in- that case, Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, ante, p. 342. The statute requires that every person,- etc., who shall use or furnish to any other person, etc., to use in, with, or…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE. EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. This case was submitted with Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, ante, p. 342, and attacks the validity of a statute of the State of Washington of the same genéral import and purpose as the Florida, statute passed, on in- that case, Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, ante, p. 342. The statute requires that every person,- etc., who shall use or furnish to any other person, etc., to use in, with, or for the sale of. any goods, etc., any stamps, etc., which shall entitle the purchaser receiving the same with such sale of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
The court ruled against the motions, to dismiss, and concurring with the ruling as far as it retained jurisdiction of the suits and the persons of the defendants, we pass to the consideration of the, validity of the statute of the State. Of that it was said: “The court is fully satisfied from a bare inspection of the act without more and without considering the affidavits on file, that ibis and was intended to be prohibitive of the business methods-against which it is directed. It is plainly manifest that no merchant could afford to pay the sum of $6,000 annually for the mere privilege of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Packer Corp. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.