Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Carr
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 20, 2003No. 98,532PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RONALD J. STUBBLEFIELD, Judge.
T 1 Plaintiff appeals from order of the Trial Court granting summary judgment to Defendants based on its determination that they were immune from tort liability under 85 ©.9.2001 §§ 11 and 12, 1 and that Plaintiffs exclusive remedy was under the Workers' Compensation Act. The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket. See Okla. Sup.Ct. R. 1.36, 12 0.98.2001, ch. 15, app. 1.
BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
T2 Plaintiff, James Armstrong, was injured on May 19, 1998, as a result of a physical altercation with Defendant Gary Carr (Carr),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Soverign Ins. Co. v. Texas Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Roberts v. BarclaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Torres v. Cintas Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005