Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Barclay

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1962No. 39344PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In the court below, plaintiff Roberts sued defendants Barclay and Beck, who were sub-contractor and general contractor respectively upon a construction project in Tulsa, for damages resulting from a fall from a scaffold, which occurred in the course of plaintiff’s employment with defendant Barclay.

Defendants filed demurrers to the petition which were sustained by the trial court for the reason that the court had no jurisdiction. It was the opinion of the court that the subject matter of this action was within the exclusive purview of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Oklahoma.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Schultz v. Henry Ericsson Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Kennerly v. Shell Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Raley v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Reed Tool Co. v. CopelinTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API