Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1980No. 51630PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

The issue on certiorari is whether the “hirer” of an independent building contractor was the “principal employer” within the meaning of 85 O.S.1971 § 11 which casts secondary liability for payment of compensation benefits upon indirect or remote employers. We hold that under the Atkinson 1 “necessary-and-integral” test, the record before us is insufficient for a meaningful determination of hirer's § 11 status as the statutory employer.

A principal employer, within the meaning of the compensation law, must be defined in terms of the task for the performance of which he hired the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Jordon v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. W. P. Atkinson Enterprises, Inc. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Hammock v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Lambert v. Inryco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Newport v. Crane Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API