Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The issue on certiorari is whether the “hirer” of an independent building contractor was the “principal employer” within the meaning of 85 O.S.1971 § 11 which casts secondary liability for payment of compensation benefits upon indirect or remote employers. We hold that under the Atkinson 1 “necessary-and-integral” test, the record before us is insufficient for a meaningful determination of hirer's § 11 status as the statutory employer.
A principal employer, within the meaning of the compensation law, must be defined in terms of the task for the performance of which he hired the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Jordon v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- W. P. Atkinson Enterprises, Inc. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Hammock v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Lambert v. Inryco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1982
- Newport v. Crane Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.