Legal Opinion
Parret v. UNICCO Service Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 12, 2005No. 99,883Published
1Opinion of the Court
127 P.3d 572 (2005)
2005 OK 54
Gwendolyn Kay PARRET, Plaintiff,
v.
UNICCO SERVICE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, and Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., d/b/a Dayton Tire, an Ohio Corporation, Defendants.
No. 99,883.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
June 28, 2005.
Order Denying Rehearing September 12, 2005.
John S. Gladd, James N. Edmonds, J. Craig Buchan, Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Holeman, Phipps, Brittingham & Gladd, Tulsa, Oklahoma; and G. Thorne Stallings, Jr., Stallings Law Offices, Blanchard, OK, for Plaintiff.
Robert B. Mills, Margaret K. Myers, The Mills Firm, Oklahoma City, for Defendant, UNICCO Service…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.