Legal Opinion

Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Wayne Cty. Aud.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2002No. 2001-0451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 358.] RUBBERMAID, INC., APPELLEE, v. WAYNE COUNTY AUDITOR ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Wayne Cty. Aud.,

2002-Ohio-2338.] Taxation—Complaint for reduction of taxable value—R.C. 5715.13 and 5715.19 as amended by 1998 Sub.H.B. No. 694 violate Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution. (No. 2001-0451—Submitted February 6, 2002—Decided May 29, 2002.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 97-J-1119. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT R.C. 5715.13 and R.C. 5715.19 as amended by 1998…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Cicco v. StockmasterOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Sharon Village Ltd. v. Licking County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Board of Education v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dixon v. WalcuttOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API