Cicco v. Stockmaster
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
The issue before us is what constitutes proper service upon the Attorney General for purposes of former R.C. 2721.12 in a declaratory judgment action challenging the constitutionality of a statute, ordinance, or franchise. For the reasons more fully set forth below, we hold that a party who is challenging the constitutionality of a statute must assert the claim in the complaint (or other initial pleading) or an amendment thereto, and must serve the pleading upon the Attorney General in accordance with methods set forth in Civ.R. 4.1 in order to vest a trial court with jurisdiction under R.C.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Malloy v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Ohioans for Fair Representation, Inc. v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by57 opinions
- Butler v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Mayer v. BristowOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Grover v. BartschOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Toledo v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Avery v. Rossford, Ohio Transportation Improvement DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.