Legal Opinion

Guidice v. Jackson

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 7, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-00390-RPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MERHIGE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs allege that Virginia’s Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program as applied to the residents of Stafford County, Virginia violates federal law and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by denying them the same level of benefits that similarly situated residents in other localities receive. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief. Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 1343(3) and (4), 2201, and 2202.

Th…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sobky v. SmoleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
  2. San Lazaro Ass'n v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Stanberry v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Stanberry v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. San Lazaro Ass'n v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API