Legal Opinion
Stanberry v. Sherman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1996No. 94-8048PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Six single mothers who receive public assistance appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the state of Wyoming and the director of its Department of Family Services in a suit, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging various policies of the state in implementing the Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 601-687. We affirm.
Specifically, appellants claimed that (1) failure by Wyoming to adopt a “standard of need” (SON) reflecting current living costs violated federal law and improperly skewed a reduction in benefits authorized by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Falvo v. Owasso Independent School District No. 1-011Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Stanberry v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Johnson Ex Rel. Estate of Cano v. HolmesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2004
- Amber Myers v. Frank Bisignano, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- David D. v. Frank Bisignano, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.