Legal Opinion
San Lazaro Ass'n v. Connell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 2002No. Nos. 00-55065, 00-55610, 00-55377, 00-55963PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1091ORDER
The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge of the court has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b). The petition for rehearing is denied and the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
The opinion filed January 24, 2002, is hereby AMENDED as follows:
1. On page 1081 of the slip opinion, the text beginning “The plaintiffs relied on statutory provisions” and ending “federal guidelines. Id.” is deleted. The following new paragraph is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Morcos S. Azer Doctor's Medical Laboratory, Inc. v. Kathleen Connell John Chen Steven Fujimori Joseph P. Munso Al SchadenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ball v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ehrlich v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Granados-Oseguera v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- K.C. Ex Rel. Africa H. v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.