Legal Opinion
Granite-Groves v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 22, 1988No. 19-1094PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge WALD.
WALD, Chief Judge.
This appeal arises out of a contract between appellant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) and ap-pellee Granite-Groves 1 (Contractor) for the construction of a part of the Washington, D.C. subway system. During performance of the contract, Granite-Groves asserted two claims for additional compensation, to wit: (1) claim No. 4251 for additional tunneling costs that were allegedly incurred because the subsurface conditions encountered by the contractor differed materially from those indicated in the pre-bid…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Arundel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- George Hyman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- S.A. Healy Company v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Nello L. Teer Company v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Kingston Constructors, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Committee of Blind Vendors v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Kingston Constructors, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.