Legal Opinion
North Slope Technical Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 21, 1988No. 291-86CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a direct access government contracts case filed pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(1) (1982). Plaintiff North Slope Technical Limited, Inc. (“North Slope”) seeks an equitable adjustment for an alleged Type I differing site condition1 encountered during contract performance at Eielson Air Force Base near Fairbanks, Alaska. Specifically, North Slope claims that it encountered water conditions during excavation that were unanticipated in view of project plans and specifications, thus requiring a complex and costly dewatering system. Upon consideration of the evidence…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Iacobelli Construction, Inc. v. County of Monroe, Rochester Pure Waters District, and Calocerinos & Spina Consulting Engineers, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Randa/madison Joint Venture III v. Gregory Robert Dahlberg, Acting Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Neal & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Municipality of Anchorage v. Frank Coluccio Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.