Legal Opinion

Arbaugh v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1978No. Civ. 51133PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOERTZEN, J. *

Defendant Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company (hereinafter defendant) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Glen O. Arbaugh (plaintiff) and plaintiff-in-intervention Transport Indemnity Company (intervener).

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained at a warehouse owned by defendant while in the course of his employment for Signal Trucking Co. (Signal). The intervener herein was Signal’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier at the time of the accident. Also named in plaintiff’s action was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Layman v. Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API