Associated Construction & Engineering Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We must determine whether the principles of comparative negligence prescribed in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226, 78 A.L.R.3d 393], are to be applied to the adjudication of employers’ subrogation rights within the workers’ compensation system. In particular, we consider whether Witt v. Jackson (1961) 57 Cal.2d 57 [17 Cal.Rptr. 369, 366 P.2d 641], and Roe v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 12 Cal.3d 884 [117 Cal.Rptr. 683, 528 P.2d 771]—which prevent a negligent employer from obtaining any credit toward future workers’ compensation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Aceves v. Regal Pale Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Clark v. PacificorpWashington Supreme Court · 1991
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.