Legal Opinion

Leipham v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 15, 1995No. 34386-6-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alsdorf, J. *

The beneficiaries of Howard and Alice Morris estates (the Leiphams) contend that the trial court erred in concluding on summary judgment that they had no legal malpractice claim against Ms. Morris’ attorney, Thomas C. Adams, Jr. (Adams). They also contend that the trial court erred in concluding that, during her lifetime, Ms. Morris accepted her husband’s interest in a joint account, thus precluding Puget Sound Bank, 1 her personal representative, from filing a disclaimer of that interest for tax purposes. We affirm.

I

Facts

Howard and Alice Morris were husband and wife, and in 1988…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. King County Fire Protection District No. 16 v. Housing AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Trask v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bohn v. CodyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parks v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Hetzel v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. In Re Theodore A. Kolb, Debtor. Robert M. Cassel, on Behalf of This Chapter 11 Estate v. Hilde Kolb, Trustee Jonathan Kolb Richard Kolb Douglas KolbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. In Re Estate of DrwenskiWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Vance v. BizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API