Parks v. Fink
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.
¶1 — In this attorney negligence case, nonclient Terry Parks alleges that attorney Janyce Fink owed him a *368duty of care to promptly execute the will naming him as a prospective beneficiary. To impose a duty in this case would severely compromise the attorney’s duty of undivided loyalty to the client and impose an untenable burden on the attorney-client relationship. We therefore hold that an attorney owes no duty of care to a prospective beneficiary to have a will executed promptly.
FACTS
¶2 Testator John J. Balko suffered from terminal cancer. He signed a will prepared by attorney Alan…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Est. of Robert H. Agnew v. Ross, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Linth v. GayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- In Re The Estate Of: Donald C. MullerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Monique Messenger v. Shannon L. WhitemarshCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.