Legal Opinion

Hinz v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1923No. 13491PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was a suit in equity commenced by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, seeking to enjoin tbe defendants in error, defendants below, from tbe enforcement of a certain resolution passed by tbe commission of tbe city of Sand Springs for tbe purpose of divesting the plaintiff, as commissioner of public affairs and safety and ex-officio mayor of said city, of bis authority and jurisdiction as bead of tbe police department and vesting the same in tbe defendant W.- S. Cash, as commissioner of streets and public property.

Upon trial to tbe court tbe relief prayed for was denied, and it is to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. In Re Initiative Petition, City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Cook v. ChildsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Wewoka v. RodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Caruth v. State Ex Rel. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Goodwin v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Midwest City v. CravensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API