Legal Opinion
Midwest City v. Cravens
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 14, 1975No. 47552PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice:
The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), as the bargaining agent for the Midwest City Police Department, sought to negotiate the terms and conditions of an employment contract with Appellee, the City of Midwest City (City). City refused to negotiate the salary portion of the contract on the grounds that it called for a reclassification of Police personnel and under City’s charter, City was solely responsible for such matters.
FOP filed a charge with Appellant, Public Employees Relation Board (Board), against City. FOP alleged, inter alia, that City had engaged in and was engaging in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Springfield v. ClouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Wichita Public Schools Employees Union, Local No. 513 v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Fire Fighters Local Number 946 v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Hall v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- City of Tulsa v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.