Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Welch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1936PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This suit is prosecuted under and by virtue of the Declaratory Judgment Act, challenging the constitutionality of the Tax Supervising and Conservation Commission Act (Chapter 208, Oregon Laws 1921, Oregon Code 1930, §§ 69-1201 to 69-1217, inclusive), and for the purpose of obtaining the proper construction thereof in the event that it is held valid.

The purpose and object of the act is thus expressed in the title thereof, viz:

“Providing for the supervision, regulation, limit,a,tion and levy of taxes of counties having a population of more than 100,000, and of all municipal and quasi munieipal…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Addison CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Savage v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. City of Portland v. DuntleyOregon Supreme Court · 1949

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API