Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Gillis v. Goodrich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 13, 1935No. 30,767PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

In my opinion the majority have in effect amended the charter of St. Paul by judicial interpretation. I therefore dissent. We are not concerned here with the desirability of conferring upon the comptroller the powers of a board of estimate. We are concerned solely with the question of whether or not the charter confers such powers. Nor are we concerned with the question whether the charter has made him solely a "bookkeeping" officer or has in instances other than here involved expressly endowed him with the exercise of discretion. The sole question here is whether he has the powers of a board…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Sommers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Gillis v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API