Legal Opinion
Smiley v. Holm
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 11, 1932No. 617PublishedCited by 285 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
Under the re-apportionment following the fifteenth decennial census, as provided by the Act of Congress of June 18, 1929 (c. 28, 46 Stat. 21, 26), Minnesota is entitled to nine representatives in Congress, being one less than the number previously allotted. In April, 1931, the bill known as House File No. 1456, dividing the State into nine congressional districts' and specifying the counties.pf which they should be composed, was passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State and was transmitted to the Governor, who returned it without his approval. Thereupon, without…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by285 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baraka v. McGreeveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
280 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.