Legal Opinion
John Faulkner v. Adt Security Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 17, 2013No. 11-16233PublishedCited by 340 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SACK, Circuit Judge:
John Faulkner, a California resident, brought a putative class action against ADT Security Services, Inc., ADT Security Systems, West, Inc., and Tyco International, Inc., (collectively “ADT”) in California Superior Court alleging that ADT recorded his telephone conversation with an ADT representative without his consent in violation of Section 632 of California’s invasion of privacy law. Cal.Penal Code § 632. The case was later removed by the defendant to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on diversity grounds. Upon ADT’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by340 opinions
- Maria Pena v. City of Rio Grande City, TexaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Hancock Park Capital II, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Fayelynn Sams v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Shayna Lathus v. City of Huntington BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.