Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 2011No. S170577PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In this proceeding we address, at the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1 questions about the applicability of California law to nonresident employees who work both here and in other states for a California-based employer. We conclude the Labor Code’s overtime provisions (id., §§ 510, 1194) do apply to plaintiffs’ claims for compensation for work performed in this state, and that the same claims can serve as predicates for claims under California’s unfair competition law (UCL) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.). We also conclude that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Anschutz Corp. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- Liberty Synergistics Inc. v. Microflo Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Aaron Senne v. Kansas City Royals BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Adobe System Inc. v. Blue Source Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.