Legal Opinion

DeHaven v. Hoskins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1989No. 887SC846PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal from an order granting summary judgment to one of the two defendants in this personal injury action. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

I

On the evening of 24 July 1986, the plaintiffs, Dorothy and James DeHaven, went to visit their next-door neighbors, defendants Betty and James Hoskins, to show them their new car. Betty Hoskins had begun to prepare dinner before they drove up, and was heating a pan of vegetable oil on the stove to make french fries when Dorothy DeHaven came to the door and asked her to come outside. Betty Hoskins went out, leaving the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Fox v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Hoots v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Jenkins v. Lake Montonia Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Smith v. Winn-Dixie Charlotte, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Daniel v. City of MorgantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API